Predicting the future is a little bit hard these days what with the shamefully nonexistent progress these fat cat scientists in Washington DC have made on the time machines they promised us years ago. But against all odds I just came back from a trip twenty years into the future myself, and it was pretty informative. Still no fucking jet packs, so that kind of sucks. But on the plus side no zombie robot apocalypse either, so call it even.
There was one question on everyone's minds that I talked to though, which was this: "Why is my kid a fucking moron?"
They say hindsight is 20/20, and even though they are a bunch of clueless fucks, they're right in this instance. It's easy to look backward and pinpoint pivotal events in history with the aid of historical distance. From time to time however you just get a feeling about a momentous event where you absolutely know instantly how it is going to effect human history. Like this story for example:
AUSTIN, Tex. — After three days of turbulent meetings, the Texas Board of Education on Friday approved a social studies curriculum that will put a conservative stamp on history and economics textbooks, stressing the superiority of American capitalism, questioning the Founding Fathers’ commitment to a purely secular government and presenting Republican political philosophies in a more positive light...
In recent years, board members have been locked in an ideological battle between a bloc of conservatives who question Darwin’s theory of evolution and believe the Founding Fathers were guided by Christian principles, and a handful of Democrats and moderate Republicans who have fought to preserve the teaching of Darwinism and the separation of church and state.
Since January, Republicans on the board have passed more than 100 amendments to the 120-page curriculum standards affecting history, sociology and economics courses from elementary to high school. The standards were proposed by a panel of teachers.
“We are adding balance,” said Dr. Don McLeroy, the leader of the conservative faction on the board, after the vote. “History has already been skewed. Academia is skewed too far to the left.”
Battles over what to put in science and history books have taken place for years in the 20 states where state boards must adopt textbooks, most notably in California and Texas. But rarely in recent history has a group of conservative board members left such a mark on a social studies curriculum.
First of all, wow. Secondly, you ever see a post-apocalyptic or dystopian movie and think "I wonder how things got to this point in this universe? Where did shit go wrong for these people in such a way that now they can't have kids anymore, or they ran out of water or they're slaves to mole men from Jupiter or whatever?" Well, if any of us are unfortunate enough to survive five minutes into the future in this rotted corn husk of a society we live in we won't really need to ask, because now we know.
...Mavis B. Knight, a Democrat from Dallas, introduced an amendment requiring that students study the reasons “the founding fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring the government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion above all others.” It was defeated on a party-line vote. After the vote, Ms. Knight said, “The social conservatives have perverted accurate history to fulfill their own agenda.”
Cynthia Dunbar, a lawyer from Richmond who is a strict constitutionalist and thinks the nation was founded on Christian beliefs, managed to cut Thomas Jefferson from a list of figures whose writings inspired revolutions in the late 18th century and 19th century, replacing him with St. Thomas Aquinas, John Calvin and William Blackstone. (Jefferson is not well liked among conservatives on the board because he coined the term “separation between church and state.”) “The Enlightenment was not the only philosophy on which these revolutions were based,” Ms. Dunbar said.